Month: August 2018

Ep 6 – Stay Out Of My Uterus

Bold & Bawdy Episode 6

Stay Out of My Uterus

 

Episode Description:

In this episode we talk about reproductive rights and how the Trump administration has made shady moves that threaten women’s health and reproductive liberty. Get informed and take action, the midterm elections are just around the corner.   

 

Maddie opens the episode with a state of of affairs for women since Trump took office, and

questions why so many decisions tied to women’s sexual rights are made by 90% old white men. Lina D can’t stand the multiple conversations led by men regarding what women should be doing with their bodies. Westley talks about his fear of Handmaid’s Tale becoming a reality in this political environment.

Trump, Pence, the administration and Congress had already targeted women in the first 100 days in office. Read below for a quick recap of the issues. Want to learn more? Read this article from Planned Parenthood.

  1. Trying to Strip Maternity Care to Help Pass the ACA Repeal Bill: Pence and the House Freedom Caucus negotiated to revive the failed ACA repeal bill by giving states the option to eliminate plan coverage of the essential health benefits (EHBs). EHBs are core health care services that the majority of plans must cover under ACA. This includes maternity and newborn coverage, mental health and substance abuse treatment, and prescription drugs. This proposal eliminates maternity care, reduces women’s access to birth control, and raises insurance costs for women. It would create a situation where women may not be able to prevent pregnancy and get medical care once they’re pregnant.
  2. Undermining Protections for Title X, the Nation’s Family Planning Program: Title X is a law passed in 1970 by Nixon. It was the first federal subsidy to help lower-income families obtain access to birth control which started in 1965 as part of President Lyndon Johnson’s “War on Poverty.” Nixon thought the subsidies were not adequate and they were expanded. On March 30, Pence cast a vote in the Senate to dismantle President Obama’s rule protecting access to basic health care services through Title X and then Trump signed the bill into law. Under the Obama administration, the rule allowed for patients to have access to critical Title X care from the most qualified family planning provider available, regardless of whether it separately provided abortion services. Under the new law, anti-women’s health state politicians can block patients with low incomes from getting care from reproductive health care providers, including Planned Parenthood because they also provide safe, legal abortion.
  3. Confirming Anti-Abortion Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court: 63% of voters agree with the landmark Supreme Court decision on abortion, while 31% disagree. There is a small gender divide on the issue, with women agreeing on the decision at 65% and men just four points behind. On April 7, Trump’s allies in the Senate voted to confirm Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court by a thin vote. Gorsuch’s judicial record threatens reproductive health and rights. Over the next few years, the Supreme Court could rule on laws that undermine access to basic health care, target the LGBTQ community for discrimination, and deny the essential right to safe and legal abortion. Justice Gorsuch has a history of going to extraordinary lengths to interfere with reproductive health and rights, and his alarming record and judicial philosophy leave no doubt that he will vote to restrict access to abortion.

 

We also cover the most recent policy

  • proposal by Trump administration to bar clinics that provide abortion services or referrals from receiving family-planning funds
  • This Impacts the $260 million Title X program- which provides basic primary and preventive services for low-income women and families.
  • The defense used is that this will ensure that taxpayers do not “indirectly fund abortions.”
  • The program could lead to doctors not being allowed to discuss comprehensive health-care options.
  • Planned Parenthood, which serves 41% of the 4 million people who get care through the program, could lose as much as $60 million in funding.

 

The Story in Iowa– a case study that shows the impacts to how Title X funds will be blocked

  • 4 Iowa centers closed, drops the state’s number of clinics to 8 effective June 30 and disrupts care for some 15,000 patients.
  • Gov. Terry Branstad signed legislation into law in May, so that Iowa could decline $3 million in federal Medicaid money that funded family planning. The state declined the funding dollars on the grounds it did not want to funnel taxpayer money into abortion services
  • BUT funds are rarely used for abortion. It pays for other treatments a person might seek at a gynecologist or a urologist. People impacted might not be able to afford those visits otherwise.
  • Centers closed:
    • Sioux City, served 4,810 patients
    • rural Keokuk center, served 1,871 people and existed as the sole provider for 92% of family planning patients from surrounding Lee County in 2015
    • Burlington center, served 4,187 patients and offers crucial care to a medically underserved population
    • Quad City, Bettendorf center, served 3,829 patients.

 

The Facts on how the funding is used

  • Planned Parenthood receives over $500 million from the federal government each year in the form of Medicaid reimbursements and Title X grants.
  • Title X applies only to family planning: contraception, pelvic exams, HIV testing, pap smears, cancer screenings, all for impoverished and low-income patients seeking services at a publicly funded clinic.
  • It never funds abortion, but Trump gave states the go-ahead to withhold Title X funds from family planning entities that offer abortion services anyway.
  • Medicaid, is only used to pay for abortion when an unwanted pregnancy results from rape or incest, and when a pregnancy threatens the life or health of the mother.
  • Exceptions are rare: 2010 saw 331 Medicaid-funded abortions. For reference, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention logged 765,651 abortions for 2010.
  • In 2015, publicly funded clinics in Iowa helped prevent 11,000 unintended pregnancies and 4,000 abortions.

 

Know the Issues and Get Involved

https://www.prochoiceamerica.org/

 

What do you know about the issues related to:

  • Abortion
  • Birth Control
  • Fighting Pregnancy Discrimination
  • Paid Family Leave

 

Resources

https://statusofwomendata.org/explore-the-data/reproductive-rights/#section-a

 

Episode 5 – Family Separation at The Border: A Recap

Episode Description: The past few months have been a constant barrage of tweets, breaking news headlines, and articles about the “immigration crisis.” This administration has had no shortage of excuses when it comes to directing blame and skirting accountability for the separation of families at the border. So what statements are fact and which ones are fiction? Listen to this week’s episode to get a recap of the events and learn what sides of this issue still require our attention and call for us to stay involved to prevent further infringement of human rights.

 

We briefly talked about this topic in our first episode of the season (Woke in Review) and we wanted to revisit the topic to provide you with a better account of what has been happening. There has been so much that has happened and the administration has not been honest about what is happening.

During our conversation it was interesting to find that the three of us had learned about the family separation issue at different times. Maddie spoke about how she heard about it earlier in 2018. She was keeping up with the deportations and rhetoric around it but the family separations wasn’t really in the forefront till the pictures came out of the kids in the detention centers. Westley first heard of it back in February and the issue did not entirely catch Lina D’s attention until she saw a headline that positioned the issue as if the kids were being rescued from human trafficking situations. This was in May and her bullshit meter went off especially since Session’s Zero Tolerance policy had taken effect on April 6th.

Let’s do a recap of the situation and take a look at the chronology of events.

The articles below were used as a resource.

The Intercept: The U.S. Has Taken More Than 3,700 Children From Their Parents — And Has No Plan For Returning Them

Politifact: What You Need To Know About The Trump Administration’s Zero-tolerance Immigration Policy

CNN: The Remarkable History of The Family Separation Crisis

The Timeline

  • April 6, 2018: The “zero tolerance” policy orders authorities to criminally prosecute all individuals crossing the border illegally- includes asylum-seekers and parents arriving with small children.
  • April 2018 to May 2018: 1,995 children reported to be separated at the border
  • May 26, 2018: Trump tweets that the democrats are to blame for a “law” that separates families at the border. The tweet reads:

Put pressure on the Democrats to end the horrible law that separates children from there* parents once they cross the Border into the U.S. Catch and Release, Lottery and Chain must also go with it and we MUST continue building the WALL! DEMOCRATS ARE PROTECTING MS-13 THUGS. 9:59 AM – May 26, 2018

*Spelling has been maintained from the source

  • May 2018 to June 2018: Additional 2,342 children were reported to be separated. This is in addition to the approx 1,500 children that were separated from Oct 2017 to earlier this year.
  • June 20, 2018: Trump signs executive order to stop separating families at the border

There is a lot here that we should fact check so let’s start with fact checking Trump’s statement about the “law.”

There is no such democratic law that is separating families- it’s actually the zero tolerance policy that is enabling the separations. Zero tolerance ends up criminalizing all adults who cross the border illegally. That means that children cannot remain with their parents once they are charged.

Trump has made mention of “loopholes” that have contributed to the “immigration crisis”

What exactly is he referring to?

  • Flores v Reno: 1997 court settlement requires the government to release children from immigration detention either to their parents, relatives or protective programs.
  • 2008 Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act signed by Bush made this a law
  • 2015 a federal judge in California ruled that Flores requirements apply to unaccompanied minors and to children apprehended with their parents. The judge also ordered the Department of Homeland Security to release parents detained along with their children.

The Trump Administration reversed these protections with Zero Tolerance Policy.

We talk through what was happening with families at the border prior to the Trump administration:

  • Before Trump came into office, families were detained together, sent back immediately or paroled into the country
  • Prosecutions were rare: cost, time-consuming, previous administrations felt broad use of the ‘prosecute-first’ option was needlessly harsh, only used for repeat offenders
  • Now, prosecution is happening across the board and has become the uniform policy.

We mention how the administration started plotting the implementation of this policy

  • considering separating families at the border since the early months of his presidency
  • harsh treatment deter illegal immigration- John Kelly, then the Homeland Security secretary

The area that isn’t being considered by the administration and is not being elevated enough, is the traumatic impact these events have on the children.

  • children who are traumatized by that separation
  • traumas they suffered along the migration journey or in their country of origin
  • hundreds of immigrant children were placed in state foster care facilities across the country.
  • parents will have a difficult time proving their right to reunification.
  • Once in foster care the kids become wards of the state. They have their care and custody decisions handled by state welfare agencies and then by a state court.
  • Parents are given an opportunity to prove their ability to take care of their kids but due to their undocumented status this proves difficult. Especially because the courts  consider a parent’s undocumented status and their willingness to cross the border illegally as proof of parental unfitness sufficient to terminate parental rights.
  • For deported parents seeking reunification with their children, the prohibition on re-entry can be a major hurdle. It means parents cannot enter the U.S. to contest the termination of their parental rights. If parents do attempt re-entry after deportation they risk arrest, which further hampers their efforts to be reunited with their kids. Courts have repeatedly confirmed that an undocumented immigrant’s motivations for illegal reentry are irrelevant, and thus treat deportation as abandonment.

We reference the story of Alejandra and Temo Juarez to make a case for becoming informed about what is happening in our country and stress the importance of staying on top of what policy changes mean. You can read more of the story in the article: Chicago Tribune: Facing Deportation, Wife Of U.S. Marine Chooses To ‘self-deport’ To Mexico

So to inform you on the latest policy and the implications that it has on the ongoing immigration conversation we disset what has happened since the signing of the executive order.

CNN: What Trump’s Family Separations Executive Order Does

  • maintain family unity,” a new position from the administration which had been defending the separation of families and blaming the families themselves for putting themselves in the position of being separated by crossing the border illegally
  • adults will not be turned over to the Justice Department when they face criminal charges, and will instead stay with their children in detention with the Department of Homeland Security.
  • Justice Department will continue to prosecute adults who cross the border illegally in federal court, the order says, Trump asks that families be housed together “where appropriate and consistent with law and available resources.”
  • Called out that family cases would be prioritized
  • Seeks to change the policy dictated by Flores v. Reno
  • Didn’t require families to be reunited but court order from San Diego judge ordered that the administration reunite all children with their families by July 27th
  • some 700 children remain in youth shelters.
  • government says some of the parents are not eligible to be unified. Some have criminal records, or they’re locked up in county jails or state prisons. And then, there are hundreds of parents the government has lost track of. They were released into the U.S., or they’ve already been deported back to Central America.

What can we do to take action and stay involved?

The Cut: What You Can Do Right Now to Help Immigrant Families Separated at the Border

The Rolling Stone: 5 Things You Can Do to Fight Family Separation Right Now

  • Volunteer at organizations that support intake along the border
  • Donate to nonprofits
  • Contact your elected officials
  • Vote

 

Want to read more about this topic? Take your pick from the articles below.  

The Washington Post: Fact-checking Immigration Spin On Separating Families And 1,500 ‘lost’ Children

CNN: Us Lost Track Of 1,500 Immigrant Children, But Says It’s Not ‘legally Responsible’

Politifact: Donald Trump Blames Democrats For Own Immigration Policy Separating Families

USA Today: Trump Signs Executive Order On Immigration, But Says ‘zero Tolerance’ Will Continue

PBS: Trump Administration Seeks To Close Immigration ‘loopholes’

NBC News: Judge Orders U.S. To Reunite Families, Stop Border Separations